Simulating the Life and Death of Last Names: Initial Findings
A few months ago, my friend put forth an interesting question: What happens to the number of last names over time? It is common to hear about a family name dying with a last descendant who never had any children. That suggests that it is possible that in the future, we will all have just one of a handful of last names, as most of them will have died off. Yet, I would expect that if it could happen, it should have happened by now, or at the very least, I would be able to discern some kind of sign suggesting a trend toward fewer last names. But the number and diversity of last names on Earth is quite remarkable, and it’s still a uncommon thing for two unrelated people to meet and have the same last name.
Anyway, in the spirit of curiosity, I decided to write a small Ruby script that would simulate the progression of last names over many generations, just to see what the end result might be. I had an enjoyable time exploring the problem, and ended up with some interesting results.
Basic assumptions for my model
First, I had to model the way that last names are passed down in order to write a simulation. Here are the basic assumptions that I made:
- Names are always inherited from the father
- Boys and girls are born with equal probability
- Each generation, every woman gives birth to at least two children
- Each woman procreates with exactly one man randomly sampled from the male population
- A man can procreate with multiple women, or with none. A man is randomly selected for each woman, so a man could be selected multiple times, or not at all.
I also decided to cut off each simulation after 1500 generations, which was a reasonable amount of time for my computer to run a few simulations, and would also effectively simulate about 45 thousand years of human life, under the assumption that a generation is 30 years.
Of course, many of these assumptions are not particular representative of the real world, but they provide a set of rules that we can start experimenting with.
I played around with the problem a bit, trying different starting population sizes and different ways to determine the number of children a couple would have. Here’s what I found.
Last Names in the End Game
- The number of last names would quickly dwindle, but often by the 1000th generation they would stabilize at some number between 2 and 8. Over 100 separate trials, here is the histogram of the number of last names in existence after 1500 generations.
- If I set the number of children per couple at two, then the population stays roughly stable, with some moderate fluctuations due to randomness in the gender of the children being born. If I have a starting population of 50 men and 50 women, then they die out pretty quickly because the population runs out of men within a few generations.
- So in order for an initial population of 50 to survive, I have to set the number of children to be greater than 3, to ensure that they don’t die out due to random fluctuations. But because three children are being born for every two adults, the population experience exponential growth, and the population size soon becomes too large for my computer to handle.
- I end up settling for an intial population of 5000 men and 5000 women, which is large enough to withstand the random fluctuations to survive.
The biggest result of this vastly simplified model is that the last names indeed diminish down to some small number of last names that becomes stable. It is interesting to see this, because it suggests that it is a potential outcome, although my intuition says that it’s unlikely due to the unrealistic assumptions of the underlying model.
On the other hand, some estimates say that 85 percent of China’s population have one of 100 surnames. After all, the Chinese people do call themselves “Old 100 surnames” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baixing). But doesn’t seem to be the case in most parts of the world.
It isn’t immediately clear why in particular the model doesn’t match what I’ve observed in the real world. If it’s one or more of my underlying assumptions for the model, it isn’t clear which of them result in the difference.
It is certainly possible that my simulation, which approximates 45,000 years, does actually predict the future, and that our society is still too early in the process to have reached the end state. After all, I don’t think that the concept of last names have existed in society for more than a few thousand years.
In particular, it is interesting to note a significant flaw in my model. Due to the way that I’ve simulated the pairing of couples, a large portion of men actually don’t get a chance to mate at all in each generation! When the population of men and women are equal in size, the expected proportion of the male population that doesn’t get picked by any woman is roughly 1/e, or 0.368. If there are n men and n women, then the probability that a man is not picked by any woman is simply ((n-1)/n)n, which approaches 1/e as n gets large.
When I have time, I would like to spend some more time with this problem to better answer the questions that still remain. Here are some potential avenues for exploration.
- Devising and implementing a more accurate model of how couples are actually formed, so that there isn’t a significant portion of the male population that is left out each generation.
- Experiment with desirability: Give each person some measure of desirability, which affects their rate of procreation and influences their children’s desriability.
- Play with different lengths of simulations. Perhaps end the simulation only after the number of last names stay stable for some number of generations. Maybe all simulations will eventually end with two last names, or perhaps there could be different stable outcomes.
- Play with randomly adding new last names throughout the process
I may post a followup post at some point with some further results after I spend some more time with this experiment!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34